From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Oct 23 14:27:27 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA29444
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:27:27 -0700
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA29438
          for <hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:27:23 -0700
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA11802; Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:19:32 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199510232119.OAA11802@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Netscape puzzle
To: kaleb@x.org (Kaleb S. KEITHLEY)
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 1995 14:19:32 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199510231924.PAA01221@exalt.x.org> from "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" at Oct 23, 95 03:24:30 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 763       
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > We already know there are differences in the way the environment
> > code works, and you are highly dependeint on that code.
> > 
> > Have you tried it with an explicit "-display" argument instead of
> > relying on the environment?
> 
> I've tried everything. Nothing works.

Try the old bind code.  It's possible the BSDI didn't update.

Or try the new code.  It's possible they did.

Note that your sendmail and bind versions *must* be matched by release
date, opr sendmail will dump stuff in the spool and you'll get a big
delay until the next time it runs and flushes the stuff out.  First
tries will always fail...


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.