From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 28 11:27:02 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA29510 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 11:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA29502 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 11:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA02460; Mon, 28 Apr 1997 11:25:49 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199704281825.LAA02460@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: VFAT 32 support in msdosfs To: ksmm@cybercom.net (The Classiest Man Alive) Date: Mon, 28 Apr 1997 11:25:49 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, joa@kuebart.stuttgart.netsurf.de, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19970428020338.00707950@cybercom.net> from "The Classiest Man Alive" at Apr 27, 97 10:03:38 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >I don't know how you got an OEMSR2 boot block and INT 21 code onto a > >VFAT drive, but I'd be interested in finding out. > > I formatted the drive as a FAT drive then installed Windows 95. It booted. > I'm not sure what else there is to tell you. There's your answer... OEMSR2 is a preinstall-only. If you installed regular Windows 95, you didn't install OEMSR2 (unless you are an OEM?). Tony@Dell answered the question of whether or not OEMSR2's INT 21 code used during boot can "see" VFAT and not just VFAT32 (it can), so it's less anomalous anyway. Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.