From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 14:22:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCC316A4CE; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:22:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D4543D1F; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 14:22:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iA5EORf4031747; Fri, 5 Nov 2004 07:24:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <418B8CE3.9000000@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 07:23:31 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040929 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org Subject: 5.x discussions should migrate to freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2004 14:22:26 -0000 All, Now that 5.3 is about to be released (really, I mean it this time!) and 5.x is considered -STABLE, further 5.x discussions and bug reports should migrate over to the freebsd-stable mailing list. I know that after 4+ years, there is probably a lot of sentimental attachment to freebsd-current, and some of you probably have never seen a branch go stable yet, but just like watching your kids graduate and go to college, it's time to accept that our baby has grown up =-) There are already a number of differences between the two branches that make it hard to distill bug reports (ULE and GEOM, for example), so this should be seen as a way to help continue to stabilize 5.x and also get ready for 6.0. Scott