From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 17:43:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B8216A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:43:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B054A43D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:43:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.3.247.219] ([206.13.39.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j59HjrA6075543; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:46:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42A87EBC.9080405@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:39:08 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francisco Reyes References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:43:52 -0000 Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > >> It's an nForce4. I run FreeBSD 6-CURRENT on it as my normal desktop. >> The only thing that doesn't work is the ethernet port. > Ah, sorry, I generally forget that software RAID is a function that should work ;-) I have no idea if it does or not, Soeren Schmidt would be a good person to ask. > > The original message asked about RAID (if I recall correctly). Do you > know if the RAID is supported? > >> attempt to bring the PHY up. > > > I think the motherboard I have also has the same Network card.. so you > think it will be supported eventually on 6? I want to get it fixed, yes. However, I likely won't get it fixed for 6.0. If someone else out there wants to look at it, please do. Scott