From owner-freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 26 10:08:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E68D737B401 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D20643FA3 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:08:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3QH7tm2001766; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:07:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3QH7sA0001765; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:07:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:07:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20030426170754.GC1552@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20030426073334.GA85139@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030426094135.GA970@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030426094135.GA970@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: ia64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: InformationWeek: Intel Sees A 32-Bit Hole In Itanium X-BeenThere: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the IA-64 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:08:13 -0000 On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 02:41:35AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Sat, Apr 26, 2003 at 12:33:34AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > IA-32 Execution Layer will take 32-bit code and convert it to 64-bit > > code that the Itanium processor can run, an Intel spokeswoman > > says. > > I wonder why the conversion if ia64 can already run ia32 applications. Because the performance of 32-bit apps on ia64 sucks ass compared to AMD Operton. Notice the timing of Intel's announcement. I personally think they're shaking in their IA64 boots.