From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org  Fri Mar 29 01:56:17 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9E41552BAD
 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:56:17 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mayuresh@kathe.in)
Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net (relay12.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.232])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 776156F546
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:56:16 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from mayuresh@kathe.in)
Received: from webmail.gandi.net (webmail14.sd4.0x35.net [10.200.201.14])
 (Authenticated sender: mayuresh@kathe.in)
 by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 111B520000A
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:55:47 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 07:25:45 +0530
From: Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Sending Tcsh to packages/ports ...
Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in
Mail-Reply-To: mayuresh@kathe.in
Message-ID: <64780f09d4251b9641e3bca39000ae2d@kathe.in>
X-Sender: mayuresh@kathe.in
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.3.8
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 776156F546
X-Spamd-Bar: --
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org;
 spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mayuresh@kathe.in designates
 217.70.178.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mayuresh@kathe.in
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[232.178.70.217.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.70.176.0/21];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org];
 RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.33)[0.333,0];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: spool.mail.gandi.net];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[kathe.in]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[mayuresh@kathe.in];
 IP_SCORE(-0.71)[ip: (-0.85), ipnet: 217.70.176.0/20(-1.49), asn: 29169(-1.21),
 country: FR(-0.01)]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.993,0];
 REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:29169, ipnet:217.70.176.0/20, country:FR];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 01:56:17 -0000

Since Tcsh is usually imported, why not send it to packages/ports 
collection?
I agree that "csh" is an historically important artifact, but do we need 
to still rely on that?
I have been using "csh" ever since I started using FreeBSD, liked it, 
but it doesn't feel light like plain old "sh" nor is as feature-full as 
"bash". To top that, the installer asks me to choose between "csh" and 
"tcsh" in-spite of being the same binary.