From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun May 12 18:48:09 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA03167 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 12 May 1996 18:48:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post.io.org (post.io.org [198.133.36.6]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA03162 for ; Sun, 12 May 1996 18:48:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zot.io.org (taob@zot.io.org [198.133.36.82]) by post.io.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA02015; Sun, 12 May 1996 21:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 12 May 1996 21:46:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao To: Don Yuniskis cc: FreeBSD hackers Subject: Re: GUS MAX on 2.1R In-Reply-To: <199605100427.VAA02550@seagull.rtd.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 9 May 1996, Don Yuniskis wrote: > > How do the irq and drq settings for the device correspond with the DOS > settings -- of which there are quite a few "extras"? Hmmmm... I don't recall having to jump through any hoops to get my GUS MAX working under 2.1R. Just two lines in my config file: controller snd0 device gus0 at isa? port 0x220 irq 12 drq 1 vector gusintr This is what I get during the device probe: gus0 at 0x220 irq 12 drq 1 on isa gus0: gus0: The port address on the card itself is set to 0x220, and I think the OS can set the IRQ/DRQ (at least the DOS drivers seem to be able to). s3mod and xanim both work beautifully with the GUS MAX. -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net) Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"