From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 15 14:03:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CDB106567D for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925288FC30 for ; Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com) Received: (qmail 22425 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2008 14:03:22 -0000 Received: from aldan.algebra.com ([216.254.65.224]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 15 Apr 2008 14:03:21 -0000 From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Virtual Estates, Inc. To: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:03:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20080414214750.699014501A@ptavv.es.net> <200804141843.22770.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> <20080415095514.ef3e6e2b.rnsanchez@wait4.org> In-Reply-To: <20080415095514.ef3e6e2b.rnsanchez@wait4.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200804151003.18644.mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, Dominic Fandrey , ports@freebsd.org, Kevin Oberman Subject: Re: what is gio-fam? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 14:03:23 -0000 =D7=A6=D7=D4=CF=D2=CF=CB 15 =CB=D7=A6=D4=C5=CE=D8 2008 08:55 =C4=CF, Ricard= o Nabinger Sanchez =F7=C9 =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC=C9: > Not quite. =9AI also faced this, but was lucky to discover in time (not > closing any open app) where this dependency was coming from. =9AThe only = port > I had to update was glib, a couple of times, and gio-fam was finally buil= t. > This was instinctive, but worked. "A couple of times"? Congratulations... One should not need this luck, nor this instinct, however. Until I decide to upgrade gnome, all other gnome-using ports should be cont= ent=20 with the version of gnome I already have... This is all patently obvious, I might add. The automatic gio-fam dependency= =20 should be made smarter and/or optional (depending on which gnome is already= =20 installed). Going forward, one hopes, gnome-team will not be so cavalier in forcing=20 upgrades... -mi