From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep  2 03:00:29 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ADA16A4E2
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  2 Sep 2006 03:00:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FC743D46
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  2 Sep 2006 03:00:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k8230SeP083973
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 2 Sep 2006 03:00:28 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k8230S4P083972;
	Sat, 2 Sep 2006 03:00:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Resent-Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 03:00:28 GMT
Resent-Message-Id: <200609020300.k8230S4P083972@freefall.freebsd.org>
Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer)
Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, NAKATA@FreeBSD.org,
	Maho <maho@FreeBSD.org>
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28F0816A4DE
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Sat,  2 Sep 2006 02:52:40 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C7C43D49
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>;
	Sat,  2 Sep 2006 02:52:39 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k822qdZw073940
	for <freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 2 Sep 2006 02:52:39 GMT
	(envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k822qdEg073939;
	Sat, 2 Sep 2006 02:52:39 GMT (envelope-from nobody)
Message-Id: <200609020252.k822qdEg073939@www.freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2006 02:52:39 GMT
From: NAKATA@FreeBSD.org, Maho <maho@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.3
Cc: 
Subject: ports/102771: repocopy requrest : math/octave -> math/octave-devel
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 03:00:29 -0000


>Number:         102771
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       repocopy requrest : math/octave -> math/octave-devel
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Sep 02 03:00:27 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     NAKATA, Maho
>Release:        6.1-RELEASE
>Organization:
FreeBSD.org
>Environment:
6.1-RELEASE
>Description:
octave has a two development currents. one is stable and the other is development
as we know, stable version is very conservative and we have a fork named
octave-forge. Development branch merges a lot of features and also the features
in octave-forge, and also developer version is not so unstable as we might think.

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:
repocopy please
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: