From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 23 21:35:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADD9106566C for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdb@carrick.bishnet.net) Received: from carrick.bishnet.net (carrick.bishnet.net [IPv6:2a01:348:132::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3998FC16 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tdb@carrick.bishnet.net) Received: from tdb by carrick.bishnet.net with local (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1MJDe8-000FHl-PR for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:35:16 +0100 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:35:16 +0100 From: Tim Bishop To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090623213516.GQ64856@carrick.bishnet.net> References: <200906181114.43935.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <3f6a88120906230713kf44c826x928beea65adf6c0e@mail.gmail.com> <20090623175247.GA65395@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> <200906231506.05001.tabthorpe@freebsd.org> <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090623203608.GB15815@comcast.net> X-PGP-Key: 0x5AE7D984, http://www.bishnet.net/tim/tim-bishnet-net.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1453 086E 9376 1A50 ECF6 AE05 7DCE D659 5AE7 D984 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-Bishnet-MailScanner-Information: Contact postmaster@bishnet.net X-Bishnet-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-Bishnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.6, required 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, NO_RELAYS -0.00) X-Bishnet-MailScanner-From: tdb@carrick.bishnet.net Subject: Re: [RFC] New category proposal, i18n X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:35:23 -0000 On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:36:08PM -0700, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Tue 23 Jun 2009 at 12:05:55 PDT Thomas Abthorpe wrote: > >Localization is a subset Internationalization, so the new category > >becomes a catch all for both entities. > > If i18n is too cryptic or too alphanumeric, and internationalization is > too long, why not go with "nls"? How about internationalisation? ;-) Tim. -- Tim Bishop