From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 15:13:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DC2106564A for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:13:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petar@smokva.net) Received: from morrison.andev.ch (morrison.andev.ch [78.47.142.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226138FC13 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:12:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petar@smokva.net) Received: from pintail.smokva.net (84-74-146-124.dclient.hispeed.ch [84.74.146.124]) by morrison.andev.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82555DB12 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:13:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:12:57 +0200 From: Petar Bogdanovic To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080626151257.GA3767@pintail.smokva.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Subject: ath hostap: antenna diversity or not? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:13:00 -0000 Hi, in order to compare the performance between antenna-diversity on and off I did a quick test with the following sysctl settings: # antenna-diversity on dev.ath.0.diversity=1 # antenna-diversity off dev.ath.0.diversity=0 dev.ath.0.txantenna=1 dev.ath.0.rxantenna=2 The performance was pretty much the same but I noticed that the link-quality reported by my laptop was notable lower with enabled antenna-diversity (AD): ~ 43/70 (AD on) ~ 51/70 (AD off) I've read a few things about AD on Wikipedia and it seems to be a good technique to achieve a better signal quality but OTOH there are people who recommend turning it off to get a better signal quality. So whats actually true here? Thanks, Petar