From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 30 23:44:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525A416A403 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0102.google.com (wx-out-0102.google.com [66.249.82.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA85C43D49 for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:44:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id i26so297398wxd for ; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.38.15 with SMTP id l15mr1498785wxl; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.0.4? ( [216.45.217.148]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id i36sm2202198wxd.2006.06.30.16.44.34; Fri, 30 Jun 2006 16:44:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:44:39 -0400 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: Seibercom In-Reply-To: <20060630182544.GG2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> References: <200606301131.29593.daeg@houston.rr.com> <20060630182544.GG2111@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060630193508.EDC6.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.25 [en] Subject: Re: batching port builds X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:44:36 -0000 Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 30/06/06 David J Brooks said: > > > If you do 'make -DBATCH' instead of 'make' - you will use the preset > > defaults for each port with options. Or you can do > > 'make config-recursive' - which will offer you all the option screens for > > the port in whose directory you're currently in and all its dependencies. > > > > See 'man ports' for more information. > > > > To use those with 'portupgrade -a' will probably take some custom scripting. > > Ah, so there's no make.conf option for this? I have: BATCH= yes in my /etc/make.conf file and it works fine. Of course I either build the port directly or use portmanager to do it so it may not work with portupgrade, although I fail to see why it would not. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net I think it's wrong that only one company makes Monopoly.