From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 10 22:46:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9376E10656C5 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from batcilla@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f224.google.com (mail-fx0-f224.google.com [209.85.220.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29AA98FC15 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm24 with SMTP id 24so83573fxm.3 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:46:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Aazix3+xmhccOFVgHn4DvjBVkMljjFgNkx7SUyFVKRA=; b=Ii4ao4EDZ9pNQv7i65irSyMLdHmiE/ExmnBdQNMZy0yemPGAin/mBywCLWwU1mvsdk qCVA54YJ6OVgwyRCSbWZ+j1chXVzV7j2cogQY3H/ChDAtAvE1FPraP7rj+9wIxHoYd5K hzeWSY/lwr7yaXWUpTxzvYmzGnFr4G/caggV0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=oEP6a03zxacatKAjiHhjisyup4RFU1xOIfqXb0Ct+2PodpOFSRYcKxkIA7QPhwiFX/ QE+iqS5F2D6Gev6M8+6qozIZtKkqfGjurRavkHfUt6lCdz31hW3fMSJlVHcZRnDC9Rx1 F56oM16nK2XbtAp9TZnynB8EiHVGmhzzZACpk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.239.154.204 with SMTP id f12mr95895hbc.153.1265840668185; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:24:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:24:28 +0200 Message-ID: <6c36ec371002101424n28589b53l7d7a14660c04ce08@mail.gmail.com> From: batcilla itself To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: TDMA link cannot pass data X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:46:56 -0000 >>On 3 Jan 2010, at 12:23, Kim Culhan wrote: [skip...] >This is odd. What happens without the bridge? > >-- >Rui Paulo I guess without the bridge ping going w/o any problem. I also tried couple of configs with wlan in different wlanmode, hostap etc: it is precisely same as Kim wrote. In case of use routed connection it work just fine. In case of: [host1]----(eth===bridge0===gif)----wlan0=====wirelesslink=====wlan0---(gif===bridge0===eth)----[host2] it is works and host1 can ping host2. in case of [host1]----(eth===bridge0===wlan0)----====wirelesslink====-----(wlan0===bridge0===etc)---[host2] broadcast packets including arp can go through bridge, other packets miss after leaving wlan in direction of wirelesslink. I seen this on very recent 8-STABLE. (FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE #1: Thu Feb 4 23:03:37 EET 2010) Can it be somehow linked with experimental bridging support for a mesh? May be there is some sysctl need to be set in non-default value. I also repeat same test with 9-CURRENT ( FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Feb 4 16:16:02 UTC 2010 ). This is really odd... -- //batcilla