From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr 17 15:51:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from a.mx.everquick.net (a.mx.everquick.net [216.89.137.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CEE37B423
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net)
Received: from localhost (eddy@localhost)
	by a.mx.everquick.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f3HMp6E12691;
	Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:51:06 GMT
X-EverQuick-No-Abuse: Report any e-mail abuse to <abuse@noc.everquick.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:51:06 +0000 (GMT)
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
To: "'current@freebsd.org'" <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>,
	Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>,
	"Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>,
	Doug Barton <DougB@DougBarton.net>
Subject: Re: FW: Filesystem gets a huge performance boost
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0104172153020.11647-100000@www.everquick.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0104172250290.12666-100000@www.everquick.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:18:34 +0000 (GMT)
> From: E.B. Dreger <eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net>
> 
> My instinct (whatever it's worth; remember my disclaimer) is that co-op
> switching using something like tsleep() and wakeup_one() or similar would
> be more efficient than trying to screw with mutexes.

Oops.  I meant asleep().


Eddy

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc.
EverQuick Internet / EternalCommerce Division

Phone: (316) 794-8922

---------------------------------------------------------------------------


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message