From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr  9 14:11:39 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6050016A4CE; Sat,  9 Apr 2005 14:11:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 97EE843D3F; Sat,  9 Apr 2005 14:11:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j39EBW9F027846;
	Sat, 9 Apr 2005 16:11:33 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 09 Apr 2005 10:06:28 EDT."
             <20050409100534.M28571@mail.chesapeake.net> 
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 16:11:32 +0200
Message-ID: <27845.1113055892@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org>
cc: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys namei.h src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c 
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 14:11:39 -0000

In message <20050409100534.M28571@mail.chesapeake.net>, Jeff Roberson writes:
>On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

>> > Where is the actual code that inspects this, is what I'm asking.  I
>> > understand the use-case, I just don't know where that actually happens.
>>
>> It is not currently published, but doing this puts yet another
>> hurdle in the way of me publishing it.
>
>Ok, that's good enough for me.  I'm fine leaving it in as long as the uses
>aren't hypothetical.  I'm going to rename it though as it has nothing to
>do with vm objects anymore.

We should rename it though.

DEVFS  can also use it to dispose of cloned devices faster.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.