From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jul 4 15:36:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C765737B409; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B58643E42; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:36:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g64Malri002582; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:36:47 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g64MalUT002581; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:36:47 -0700 Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 15:36:47 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Sean Chittenden Cc: Brooks Davis , Joe Marcus Clarke , Barney Wolff , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Skinny (SCCP) protocol gateway for libalias Message-ID: <20020704153646.A2034@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <1025480857.48597.33.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630204452.A56736@tp.databus.com> <1025485730.48597.35.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630213704.A57193@tp.databus.com> <1025487696.48597.43.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20020630202858.B10041@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20020704151541.D77084@ninja1.internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020704151541.D77084@ninja1.internal>; from sean@chittenden.org on Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:15:41PM -0700 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:15:41PM -0700, Sean Chittenden wrote: > > IMO you shouldn't consider it. Cisco will probably support this > > protocol for years. Even if they "abandon" it, it will still be > > supported because there are already sites with thousands of phone > > that aren't going to upgrade on a whim. I believe it should go in. > > If at some point in the future it is actually gone from real use, > > then it can be removed. >=20 > Ehh.. I worked for the dept in Cisco that was deploying the call > manager servers for Cisco... this puppy's going to be around for a > while: Cisco dumped a huge chunk of change into implementing and > deploying this. They're not about to write this off as a sunk cost > any time soon (unlike Unity, which got the ax). -sc Exactly, between the deployed sites and the costs of building this, Cisco isn't going to abandon this any time soon. I want to see this funcionality go in since it should improve my chances of getting a real office phone in my office (which is in a seperate state from the other corporate offices). -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9JM37XY6L6fI4GtQRAq/6AJ4wShI4cwSpCcDkmbNXfJuhoq2byACbBGhb SaUNco6xoKL9sZjXCSQ8xI4= =5N6m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message