From owner-freebsd-isp  Tue Jul 11 19:45:55 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from lark.capnet.state.tx.us (lark.capnet.state.tx.us [204.65.39.249])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D7D37B828
	for <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from Bryan.Bradsby@capnet.state.tx.us)
Received: from localhost (bbradsby@localhost)
	by lark.capnet.state.tx.us (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e6C2jj241182;
	Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:45:45 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:45:45 -0500 (CDT)
From: Bryan Bradsby <Bryan.Bradsby@capnet.state.tx.us>
To: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl@buz.ch>
Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Re[4]: load balancing
In-Reply-To: <79242131286.20000709124947@buz.ch>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0007112140090.35773-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> [snip] I need highest reability (because of some special applications)
> the load balancing stuff is quite optional at the moment and is way
> easier implemented if the failover of the balancing boxes work
> reliable...

For the highest reliability, least complexity, and instant switchover,
suggest one of the hardware load balancers, like the Foundry ServerIron,
or similar. 

> Best regards,
>  Gabriel

-bryan 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message