From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Apr  4 23:04:54 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id XAA04216 for current-outgoing; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 23:04:54 -0700
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id XAA04209 for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 23:04:52 -0700
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id XAA07984; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 23:04:25 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA00134; Tue, 4 Apr 1995 23:04:24 -0700
Message-Id: <199504050604.XAA00134@corbin.Root.COM>
X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: UNION File System... 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 95 07:52:29 +0200."
             <199504050552.HAA26095@grunt.grondar.za> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 1995 23:04:24 -0700
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> >What is the current state of usefulness of UFS?
>> 
>>    It's completely broken.
>
>Thanks. Damn. Anyone working on it?

   The author and others. I can't give any assurances that it will be working
in 2.1R; it's not a requirement for the release.

-DG