From owner-freebsd-current Tue Sep 12 06:07:50 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id GAA05157 for current-outgoing; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 06:07:50 -0700 Received: from server.netcraft.co.uk (server.netcraft.co.uk [194.72.238.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id GAA05148 for ; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 06:07:47 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by server.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA03502; Tue, 12 Sep 1995 14:07:01 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199509121307.OAA03502@server.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: libforms - thumbs up or down? To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard) Date: Tue, 12 Sep 1995 14:07:01 +0100 (BST) Cc: paul@FreeBSD.org, current@freefall.freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <3400.810910957@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 12, 95 06:02:37 am Reply-to: paul@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 952 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Jordan K. Hubbard who said > > > I only wrote it in the first place because Jordan wanted something > > for a new all singing all dancing sysinstall. If he's not interested > > in it any more it can be ditched. > > Well, interested in the concept but it seems like things are shifting > away from our original plan enough at this point that libforms may > very likely never come into play now. Let me give it one last look > before I make my final determination on that, but don't also forget > that it's presently sort of broken anyway.. :-( Really, I don't care either way. I doubt it's very broken, probably just a single fix needed somewhere since it was working when I committed it, I'm just not interested in it at the moment, having more fun hacking virtual hosting environments. -- Paul Richards, Netcraft Ltd. Internet: paul@netcraft.co.uk, http://www.netcraft.co.uk Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1225 447500 (work)