From owner-freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Sun Jul 29 20:56:54 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B871063185 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8EA79826 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C46C11063184; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gnome@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35D31063183 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4746E79815 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE5E19DB6 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w6TKuqVq060750 for ; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w6TKuqQc060749 for gnome@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214338] [PATCH] devel/glib20: new kqueue() backend for file monitoring Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: lightside@gmx.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: eugen@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 20:56:54 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214338 --- Comment #52 from lightside --- Need to note, that I just proposed some changes related to integration of t= his PR's proposal for current devel/glib20 port (based on ports r469308 and por= ts r473551 changes). I saw, that PR's reporter also proposed to replace existing gio/kqueue back= end on: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/glib/issues/1460 I maybe wrong, but I guess, this may be counterproductive, if consider amou= nt of other people's work for existing gio/kqueue backend, some of which maybe against of replacing it for some reason(s). Probably, possible to propose t= hese changes as an alternative backend, for example as an additional gio's sub-directory (e.g. there are gio/inotify (see bug #199872, comment #26, wh= ere it was possible), gio/kqueue, etc.). But this may require to adapt it for existing build system(s). So, other people may test/use this backend, if needed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=