Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:57:49 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= <eri@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru> Subject: Re: ng_ether naming Message-ID: <CAPBZQG3Yo_73Ao8Ribvr2Cshii_yKfrPaJCuOGcP44fAaG1ziQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50CA0161.1060000@FreeBSD.org> References: <50C9C012.8020306@FreeBSD.org> <50C9C55A.5090900@ipfw.ru> <50CA0161.1060000@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> wrote: > on 13/12/2012 14:08 Alexander V. Chernikov said the following: > > On 13.12.2012 15:46, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> > >> ng_ether uses if_xname for naming its nodes. > >> This could be troublesome for mapping interface names to their ng_ether > companions > >> in the face of interface renaming capability. Especially given that > interface > >> renaming and ng_ether _module_ loading may happen in an arbitrary order. > >> > >> I am not sure how to solve this best. > >> > >> One possibility is to use if_dname+if_dunit combination for ng_ether > naming. This > >> should be stable and available for querying. This behavior should also > be > >> backward compatible with ng_ether being compiled into kernel > (if_dname+if_dunit == > >> if_xname before any renaming could occur). > >> > >> Another possibility is to do ng_ether renaming when its interface is > renamed. > >> This seems nicer but appears to be more work and more intrusive, because > >> interfaces would have to know about their ng_ether nodes. > > > > Not exactly. You can register for ifnet_departure_event and > ifnet_arrival_event. > > > > Interface renaming is done via sending departure event with old name and > arrvial > > event with new one. > > Good to know. Thank you! > > > So which approach sounds better? > Or maybe there is even a better one? > > The best is interface event handling. Just recopy the new name from if_xname and should be done. > >> > >> What do you think? > >> Thank you. > >> > >> And just in case: > >> $ ifconfig -l > >> net0 lo0 > >> $ ngctl list > >> There are 2 total nodes: > >> Name: re0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num > hooks: 0 > >> Name: ngctl11353 Type: socket ID: 00000003 Num > hooks: 0 > >> > > > > > > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Ermal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPBZQG3Yo_73Ao8Ribvr2Cshii_yKfrPaJCuOGcP44fAaG1ziQ>