From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 26 00:59:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF22291 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0EE8FC0C for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (viper.tundraware.com [192.168.0.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAQ0xDxO031520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:59:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <50B2BEE1.9030903@tundraware.com> Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:59:13 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be Updated? References: <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org> <50B2AA07.8090103@tundraware.com> <201211251856.40381.lumiwa@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201211251856.40381.lumiwa@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [192.168.0.1]); Sun, 25 Nov 2012 18:59:13 -0600 (CST) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: qAQ0xDxO031520 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 00:59:25 -0000 On 11/25/2012 06:56 PM, ajtiM wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2012 17:30:15 Tim Daneliuk wrote: >> On 11/25/2012 05:25 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> On 25/11/2012 23:10, Tim Daneliuk wrote: >>>> After the recent security scare, I know the ports tree was temporarily >>>> frozen. Does anyone know when it will again be updates. I just >>>> upgraded to 9.1-PRE and need to rebuild Firefox & Thunderbird against >>>> the new libraries and ... they're broken, marked as security hazards... >>> >>> It's been being updated normally since near enough a week ago. >>> "Normally" means subject to the pre-9.1-RELEASE restrictions on sweeping >>> changes as is usual at this point in a release cycle. >>> >>> FireFox 17 and Thunderbird 17 updates were committed to ports on 20th >>> November. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Matthew >> >> Hmmm, something is amiss: >> >> [root] ~>portsnap update >> Ports tree is already up to date. >> [root] ~>cd /usr/ports/www/firefox >> [root] /usr/ports/www/firefox>make >> ===> firefox-16.0.2,1 has known vulnerabilities: >> Affected package: firefox-16.0.2,1 >> Type of problem: mozilla -- multiple vulnerabilities. >> Reference: >> http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/d23119df-335d-11e2-b64c-c8600054b392.html => >> Please update your ports tree and try again. >> *** [check-vulnerable] Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr1/ports/www/firefox. >> ** [build] Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr1/ports/www/firefox. > > I use portsnap fetch update and it works... Ah, maybe that was the problem. That works for me as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/