From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 25 18:10:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07524106564A for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:10:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DCC8FC17 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:10:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5PIAAnH073856 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q5PIAAUL073855; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:10:10 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:10:10 GMT Message-Id: <201206251810.q5PIAAUL073855@freefall.freebsd.org> To: gecko@FreeBSD.org From: Alexander Kabaev Cc: Subject: Re: ports/169389: Firefox/Thunderbird fail to build with system GCC X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexander Kabaev List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 18:10:11 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/169389; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Kabaev To: Volodymyr Kostyrko Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, kan@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/169389: Firefox/Thunderbird fail to build with system GCC Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 14:00:50 -0400 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 04:51:59PM +0300, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Hi all. >=20 > GCC 4.2.1 is rather a nice mess and known for generation of bad code=20 > with higher optimization levels. So yes, this looks quite logical for me. >=20 > --=20 > Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. Every compiler and compiler version has bugs. Should we make ports _never_ use anything more than -O just in case? After all, that was the official project stance on toolchain for a while. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFP6KdSQ6z1jMm+XZYRAmmqAJ9CpWKhgbzKXLlQ2bjtEN9OxU6LjQCgkmPz fiAXHpn6RB4+OT+jsp74KmM= =4gRv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7--