From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 18 18:49:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA0A16A4CE for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:49:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD65943D31 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mux@freebsd.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920) id C239F5C929; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 11:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 20:49:41 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion To: Mike Tancsa Message-ID: <20040918184941.GI13294@elvis.mu.org> References: <6.1.2.0.0.20040917210537.04649508@64.7.153.2> <6.1.2.0.0.20040917235915.0533eba8@64.7.153.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.0.20040917235915.0533eba8@64.7.153.2> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ICH6 (Intel 915 support) + fxp and ICH6 patches X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 18:49:42 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > > A little more digging, and it seems to be an fxp based on the 82562EZ > In if_fxp.c, I added > > > %diff -u if_fxp.c /tmp/if_fxp.c > --- if_fxp.c Wed Aug 11 17:41:25 2004 > +++ /tmp/if_fxp.c Sat Sep 18 01:35:22 2004 > @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ > { 0x103E, -1, "Intel 82801DB (ICH4) Pro/100 VM Ethernet" }, > { 0x1050, -1, "Intel 82801BA (D865) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" }, > { 0x1051, -1, "Intel 82562ET (ICH5/ICH5R) Pro/100 VE Ethernet" }, > + { 0x1064, -1, "Intel 82562EZ (ICH6)" }, > { 0x1059, -1, "Intel 82551QM Pro/100 M Mobile Connection" }, > { 0x1209, -1, "Intel 82559ER Embedded 10/100 Ethernet" }, > { 0x1229, 0x01, "Intel 82557 Pro/100 Ethernet" }, > % > > I didnt know how to update the inphy info, but it seems close enough to at > least get it working. > > fxp0: port 0xd200-0xd23f mem 0xd00a0000-0xd00a0fff > irq 12 at device 8.0 on pci1 > fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:01:80:57:29:a9 > miibus0: on fxp0 > inphy0: on miibus0 > inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > > > And it *seems* to work. A quick ftp test in either direction shows ~ > 11.1MB/s I just committed this patch. Thanks! Maxime