Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:02:05 +0100 From: Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> To: George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: FLAVORS (initial version) and subpackages proposals Message-ID: <b94829fc-29e6-3e30-b818-153f4970a2a1@madpilot.net> In-Reply-To: <58725f6d-aa60-3a62-7539-56e51e3cd76e@m5p.com> References: <20161219003143.c2qo5wn3a5kiua3m@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <58725f6d-aa60-3a62-7539-56e51e3cd76e@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/19/16 19:53, George Mitchell wrote: > On 12/18/16 19:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I have been working for a while on 2 long standing feature request for the ports >> tree: flavors and subpackages. >> [...] > > Off topic, I know, but might this eventually lead to FLAVORS for base? > I would be so grateful to have a SCHED_4BSD flavor of base so I didn't > have to keep updating my machines from source every time there was a > security update. Maybe someone can at least think about it. -- George While you wait for the improvement you ask, you can use binary updates and just recompile the kernel by hand. Should spare you some time and effort. -- Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b94829fc-29e6-3e30-b818-153f4970a2a1>