Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 20:00:25 +0900 From: Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp> To: apache@freebsd.org Cc: koichi@ddcom.co.jp Subject: Auth_PG_grp_group_field -- parameter error if commented Message-ID: <20041029195355.C4AA.REES@ddcom.co.jp>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I've sent an e-mail to Guiseppe Tanzilli about this.
We get the following error:
> Auth_PG_grp_group_field takes one argument, the name of the group-name field.
on the directive
Auth_PG_grp_group_field rid
These are the directives we are using:
Auth_PG_host 127.0.0.1
Auth_PG_port 5432
Auth_PG_database apache_auth
Auth_PG_user postgres
Auth_PG_pwd postgres
Auth_PG_pwd_table user_bbs
Auth_PG_uid_field uid
Auth_PG_pwd_field pw
Auth_PG_grp_table user_bbs
# Auth_PG_gid_field rid # name change from 2.0.0
Auth_PG_grp_group_field rid # Auth_PG_gid_field -> Auth_PG_grp_group_field
Auth_PG_grp_user_field uid # works from 2.0.0
# Auth_PG_grp_whereclause " and rid = 'bbs@tekitou' "
Auth_PG_encrypted on
Auth_PG_hash_type MD5
AuthName "Please Enter Your Password"
AuthType Basic
<Limit POST GET>
require valid-user
require group bbs@tekitou
</Limit>
I had the guy who's working on this remove the comment from the
Auth_PG_grp_group_field rid # Auth_PG_gid_field -> Auth_PG_grp_group_field
line and apache runs with no problems.
So it looks like the comment field is getting parsed as an additional
parameter, causing an error.
I don't know whether this would be a bug or not, but I thought I'd pitch
it your way.
--
Joel <rees@ddcom.co.jp>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041029195355.C4AA.REES>