From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 18:55:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFF516A403 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from frontmail.ipactive.de (frontmail.maindns.de [85.214.95.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCF213C491 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from volker@vwsoft.com) Received: from mail.vtec.ipme.de (Q7dcf.q.ppp-pool.de [89.53.125.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by frontmail.ipactive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C77B128843 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:33:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.16.3] (cesar.sz.vwsoft.com [192.168.16.3]) by mail.vtec.ipme.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1942E752 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:33:18 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <45E71C6B.6040000@vwsoft.com> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:33:15 +0100 From: Volker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VWSoft-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com X-ipactive-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ipactive-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ipactive-MailScanner-From: volker@vwsoft.com Subject: rcNG'ification X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 18:55:38 -0000 Hi! While I've installed another port a few days ago, I came across there're still some (...or some more...) ports in the tree which aren't rcng'ified. This is bad as I've installed net-mgmt/net-snmp4 just for getting snmpwalk but am using bsnmp from the base system so I didn't wanted the snmpd to start (but it did on the next reboot and that was really, really badly stupid). I would like to take the time to work through the ports system and make sure rcNG'ification is done for every port which is starting a daemon. Just two quick questions: 1) any thoughts on that? 2) Is there any committer who is willing to receive rcng'ification patches from me by email? I don't think GNATS is a good place for probably some hundred patches (I could easily find some non-rcng ports in a few minutes without looking deeper). Greetings, Volker