From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Thu Dec 28 16:48:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BFEEA87E2; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5E0B2209; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:48:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 30C6CABAC; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:48:09 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Yuri Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r457438 - head/devel/ispc Message-ID: <20171228164809.GA33755@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712280506.vBS56ZSj011894@repo.freebsd.org> <20171228071400.GA42910@FreeBSD.org> <20171228133631.GB61460@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171228133631.GB61460@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 16:48:10 -0000 On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:36:31PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 01:29:20AM -0800, Yuri wrote: > > On 12/27/17 23:14, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > But just couple of days ago X.org/Mesa had switched to 5.0, and > > > I'm not sure what to do about this yet. > > > > Please feel free to further update ISPC's clang dependency if you feel > > this is needed for embree. > > Yes, that's probably the most straight way forward. I'm now (re)building > all the ports involved (that might take some time on my slow hardware) to > verify that CLANG_VERSION=50 does not cause regressions (vs. 40). We have a problem building `devel/ispc' againt LLVM 5.0: ... /usr/local/llvm50/lib/libLLVMSupport.a(Signals.cpp.o): In function `llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&)': /work/a/ports/devel/llvm50/work/llvm-5.0.0.src/lib/Support/Signals.cpp:(.text+0x20e0): undefined reference to `backtrace' clang-5.0: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to seeinvocation) It builds fine against LLVM 4.0. Anyone got ideas (I'm too drunk to debug this myself now) how do we proceed from here? ./danfe