From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 15 08:54:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772D116A4CE; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:54:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCC343D1D; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:54:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id 2ECC7A7; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:54:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.9.204.1] (allbery.dsl.telerama.com [205.201.8.182]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0B2A0; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:53:46 -0500 (EST) From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20040215164836.GD34704@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <402F9115.5040904@dial.pipex.com> <20040215164836.GD34704@toxic.magnesium.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1076864025.38761.2.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 11:53:46 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-35.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Alex Zbyslaw Subject: Re: mozilla-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:54:18 -0000 On Sun, 2004-02-15 at 11:48, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > Now, I can't simply use portupgrade to upgrade from 1.6a to 1.6. Instead I > > have to de-install mozilla-devel and install mozilla. > > Sure you can. > > portupgrade -o www/mozilla-gtk2 mozilla-gtk2\* But that doesn't answer the second half of his question (switching back to mozilla-devel when it again differs from mozilla), so isn't really all that useful. It seems there ought to be a better way to do this; setting the suffix to -devel and chaining to the mozilla makefile seems to make sense.... -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH