From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 04:40:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449F41065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agaviola@infoweapons.com) Received: from infoweapons.com (mailroute.hughesnet.org [184.105.238.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A1A8FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ([120.89.47.15]) by mail0.infoweapons.com with ESMTP with TLS id 4321444.9242212; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:40:17 -0800 Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:3d:2400:148b:9fc2:a186:ec38] (2001:470:3d:2400:148b:9fc2:a186:ec38) by webmail.infoweapons.com (2001:470:3d:2400::10:11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.255.0; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:40:17 +0800 Message-ID: <4F4B0930.5040302@infoweapons.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:40:16 +0800 From: Archimedes Gaviola User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hiroki Sato References: <4F4AEDBF.3000903@infoweapons.com> <20120227.131108.899978360503655703.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20120227.131108.899978360503655703.hrs@allbsd.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Cc: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Issue with multiple configured IPv6 prefixes in rtadvd.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 04:40:41 -0000 On 2/27/2012 12:11 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote: > Archimedes Gaviola wrote > in<4F4AEDBF.3000903@infoweapons.com>: > > ag> Now, my observation is that there seems to be a problem with > ag> advertising two or perhaps more prefixes in the RA message. This has > ag> been tested in 7.x and the issues were the same. FreeBSD 4.11 behave > ag> the same as well. > ag> > ag> Is this a bug or limitation of the rtadvd design implementation? > > I am wondering where you got the notation ":addrs#1:" from. Please > try the following: > > em2:\ > :mtu#1400:\ > :addr0="3ffe:501:ffff:100::":prefixlen0#64:vltime0#12345:pltime0#12345:\ > :addr1="3ffe:501:ffff:101::":prefixlen1#64:vltime1#12345:pltime1#12345: > > -- Hiroki Hi Hiroki, I got that notation from here http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-ipv6.html. Okay, let me try you're recommendation. Thanks,