Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:40:16 +0800
From:      Archimedes Gaviola <agaviola@infoweapons.com>
To:        Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Issue with multiple configured IPv6 prefixes in rtadvd.conf
Message-ID:  <4F4B0930.5040302@infoweapons.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120227.131108.899978360503655703.hrs@allbsd.org>
References:  <4F4AEDBF.3000903@infoweapons.com> <20120227.131108.899978360503655703.hrs@allbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/27/2012 12:11 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Archimedes Gaviola<agaviola@infoweapons.com>  wrote
>    in<4F4AEDBF.3000903@infoweapons.com>:
>
> ag>  Now, my observation is that there seems to be a problem with
> ag>  advertising two or perhaps more prefixes in the RA message. This has
> ag>  been tested in 7.x and the issues were the same. FreeBSD 4.11 behave
> ag>  the same as well.
> ag>
> ag>  Is this a bug or limitation of the rtadvd design implementation?
>
>   I am wondering where you got the notation ":addrs#1:" from.  Please
>   try the following:
>
> em2:\
>       :mtu#1400:\
>       :addr0="3ffe:501:ffff:100::":prefixlen0#64:vltime0#12345:pltime0#12345:\
>       :addr1="3ffe:501:ffff:101::":prefixlen1#64:vltime1#12345:pltime1#12345:
>
> -- Hiroki

Hi Hiroki,

I got that notation from here 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-ipv6.html. Okay, let me try 
you're recommendation.

Thanks,





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F4B0930.5040302>