From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 14:04:32 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EC416A401 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx3.netclusive.de (mx3.netclusive.de [89.110.132.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3EB13C467 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Fdd20.f.ppp-pool.de [195.4.221.32]) by mx3.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46FA60420D for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:04:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id D579915213; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:04:27 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:04:27 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <539c60b90703010849x33dd4bbbt8f6ca6aa0c8e83a0@mail.gmail.com> <41224.216.230.84.67.1172785646.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: garfield.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1172930667 99267 192.168.100.11 (3 Mar 2007 14:04:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 14:04:27 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: defrag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 14:04:32 -0000 On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:56:02 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > For what it's worth, this has been Microsoft's official position since > NTFS became mainstream. As usual, it's not worth much if it come from Microsoft... Regards Chris