Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 17:07:15 -0700 From: Gary Kline <kline@tao.thought.org> To: Chris <racerx@makeworld.com> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 5.3-Beta1: So far, so goo. Day 5. Message-ID: <20040826000715.GD89034@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <412D10E7.8020704@makeworld.com> References: <412D10E7.8020704@makeworld.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Chris, and howdy rest-of-list, On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:21:27PM -0500, Chris wrote: > Well - this is my 5th day using 5.3-Beta1 (sup'ing from 5.2.1-p9) > I removed the debuging code in the kernel - runs well for a Beta. Brave man... . I think I'll wait awhile before upgrading to RELENG_5. But Q1: how exactly, does one get rid of the debugging stuff? And Q2, now that we've got gcc-3.4, would it help to use a higher opyimization? say, "-O3"? .... > > Since I use KDE, I did notice that Kgpg (whatever it is) is non > functional. S'ok tho - I dont use Kmail so to me that's not an issue. > > Everything from an day-to-day basis runs. Nothing seems to have been > broken that I found. > > This is my production PC at home, so it's being used constantly. > > I'm unsure where to post this, so I sent to Questions and Current. > I've got two 400MHz platforms, so I want to be able to max'z the systems. System tuningg obviously helps, and hopefully the new compiler will help too. cheers, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040826000715.GD89034>