From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 24 20:07:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CAAEE8; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org (mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org [204.13.248.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92F9F1C08; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-8-230-52.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.230.52] helo=damnhippie.dyndns.org) by mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UV5I7-000DQA-6k; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:23:43 +0000 Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r3OJNe7I004707; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:23:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) X-Mail-Handler: Dyn Standard SMTP by Dyn X-Originating-IP: 24.8.230.52 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.dyndns.com/services/sendlabs/outbound_abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: U2FsdGVkX1/twbpd0dIjXDZFGdPCpWy1 Subject: Re: ada(4) and ahci(4) quirk printing From: Ian Lepore To: Adrian Chadd In-Reply-To: References: <20130422051452.GA2148@icarus.home.lan> <51763BF9.2000506@FreeBSD.org> <51777887.4000908@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:23:40 -0600 Message-ID: <1366831420.1231.89.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Matthias Andree X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:07:15 -0000 On Wed, 2013-04-24 at 11:59 -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I think this just outlines the problem - bootverbose is too verbose. > > eg, what the audio code outputs. And yes, net80211 when you're doing 11n. > I agree that the sound driver(s) output Too Much Stuff with bootverbose, so much so that it makes bootverbose kind of useless for other things. It would be nice if its output could be trimmed, and the fully-verbose spewage we see now would need some extra knob turned. More directly on-point to the overall thread, I think printing an extra line of info that gives more detail about how drives and controllers are being handled is a Good Idea. It's one extra line, one-time during boot. -- Ian