From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  7 10:52:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0786737B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2003 10:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from herbelot.dyndns.org (herbelot.net1.nerim.net [62.212.117.213])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E0C43FBF
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2003 10:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from thierry@herbelot.com)
Received: from diversion.herbelot.nom (diversion.herbelot.nom [192.168.2.6])
	by herbelot.dyndns.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h37HbC0f018484;
	Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thierry Herbelot <thierry@herbelot.com>
To: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com>,
	current@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:52:43 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1
References: <20030407024249.S92580@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030407024249.S92580@alpha.siliconlandmark.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200304071952.43591.thierry@herbelot.com>
Subject: Re: nge not in GENERIC?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 17:52:53 -0000

Le Monday 07 April 2003 08:45, Andre Guibert de Bruet a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Is there a reason why the MII-based nge(4) doesn't figure in GENERIC?
>

because, at least in -Current, nge can be loaded at runtime, as a kld module.

	TfH