From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Oct 25 22:50:05 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C048310CBB47; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C6476C35; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mousie.catspoiler.org (unknown [76.212.85.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: truckman) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9345A180D2; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 15:50:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: svn commit: r482963 - head/misc/exercism To: Mathieu Arnold cc: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20181025115917.z2h6zx5txmxkzrtj@ogg.in.absolight.net> Message-ID: References: <201810250948.w9P9mGSb099015@repo.freebsd.org> <20181025115917.z2h6zx5txmxkzrtj@ogg.in.absolight.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-Disposition: INLINE X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 22:50:05 -0000 On 25 Oct, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 09:48:16AM +0000, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote: >> - Move GH_TUPLE out of the USE* section. > > This is wrong, see: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/porting-order-uses.html Yes, and portlint incorrectly complains about this.