From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jan 10 17:45:25 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA13435 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:45:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA13410 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:45:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id KAA16263; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:44:38 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <369952D0.8AFC32C0@newsguy.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:24:32 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger CC: nsouch@teaser.fr, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nlpt & polling mode didn't work References: <199901101751.SAA00559@Vodix.CS.Uni-SB.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On 9 Jan, Nicolas Souchu wrote: > > >>No. lpt didn't work, but I remember it didn't work the first time I > >>tried it too. It worked only with nlpt. > > > > Timing then. nlpt is slower than lpt because of indirection calls. So > > something must have speedup the machine because nothing changed in nlpt since > > it was properly working. > > ??? Just a > make world > and a > make XFree-3.3.3 A -j8 (-j16 for smp machines) is indicated too... :-) -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com If you sell your soul to the Devil and all you get is an MCSE from it, you haven't gotten market rate. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message