From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Dec 9 2: 0:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7587E37B416 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id fB9A0sg36797; Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:00:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2001 02:00:54 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200112091000.fB9A0sg36797@apollo.backplane.com> To: Jordan Hubbard Cc: Bernd Walter , Garance A Drosihn , "Louis A. Mamakos" , Sheldon Hearn , Kirk McKusick , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Proposed auto-sizing patch to sysinstall (was Re: Using a larger block size on large filesystems) References: <3839.1007891857@winston.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> [rant deleted] : :All in your humble opinion, to be sure. I don't agree with it, :however, and enough other people clearly don't agree with it that I :most certainly can't see it as a -stable candidate for 4.5 as you :evidently do since you have the MFC marked as a week away. : :It's up to the release engineers to decide, of course, but I'm just :telling you now that I'll argue against it and that's probably the :last we need to say about it. : :- Jordan We aren't in code freeze yet. Go ahead, argue against it. I'll argue for it. It would be a shame for it to not reach -stable considering how screwed up sysinstall's auto defaults are now, but you will have to get a CORE decision to achieve that. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message