From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 20 0: 2:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from login-2.eunet.no (login-2.eunet.no [193.71.71.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B703214FEB for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (mbendiks@login-1.eunet.no [193.71.71.238]) by login-2.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.0/GN) with ESMTP id IAA16422; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:59:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA25891; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:59:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 08:59:55 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen To: "Andrew J. Korty" Cc: Matthew Dillon , Greg Black , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Entombing for FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <199904162006.PAA05648@poynting.physics.purdue.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > That makes sense, but do stackable filesystems work properly in > FreeBSD? I have many uses for the null and union filesystems, but > they seem to tend to cause panics. > This is in the works. Eivind has done most of the work already, as I recall. Nullfs appears pretty stable, though. - Marius - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message