From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 28 16:27:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 680) id 7EB4A16A4CF; Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:27:55 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:27:55 +0000 From: Darren Reed To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20050428162755.GA5668@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050428025836.E1ED67306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20050428145519.GB92579@ip.net.ua> <4270FB26.50805@samsco.org> <20050428152622.GC92579@ip.net.ua> <427100CC.8080604@samsco.org> <20050428155451.GA2192@hub.freebsd.org> <427108E6.4010202@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <427108E6.4010202@samsco.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:21:47 +0000 cc: Darren Reed cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LINT broken due to ipfilter X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:27:55 -0000 On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 10:01:42AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: .... > To my > recollection, you have not done a successfull ipfilter import in at > least two years. Yes, we all appreciate your contribution with > IPFilter, but it's also disruptive, this time especially. And given that it is usually disruptive I've tried to get it done ahead of it being "the last minute", although it's close to 11th hourish. I only realised my error earlier in the day in what I did for thinking I was ready to do a commit/import - I'd done a "make -k buildworld" to get all of the error output, subsequently forgot about the -k the next morning, looked at the bottom of the make log and saw it finished ok. :/ > >So....if you want to make it easier for people like me to make sure they > >haven't broken the build, put a target in src/Makefile that achieves this. > >That is, buildworld and buildkernel and build LINT and whatever else for > >a single platform. Or at least I think buildworld and buildkernel are > >required, seperately. "universe" is too much. > > 'make universe' is the command. And given that you still have build > problems on 64-bit machines, this command is not 'too much'. There are > fast freebsd.org machines that can run this. If you don't know, then > please ask. Hmmm, well the impression I got from reading the Makfile was that it'd build sparc/arm/x86/everything. I don't have the diskspace, never mind CPU for that...could we sittle for a galactic build target that builds everything required (user + kernel + LINT) for a single platform? Is sledge.freebsd.org the build box you're referring to here? Or is there another that's available for us? Thanks, Darren