From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 18:48:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864911065673 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FAC98FC12 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:d578:b545:b004:4d]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 911234AC1C for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:48:51 +0400 (MSD) Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:48:48 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1108033999.20110921224848@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: geom_fox vs geom_multipath? X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:48:52 -0000 Hello, Freebsd-geom. We have both geom_fox without control utility and strange way of labelling and "conventional" geom_multipath. They seems to perform same task, but geom_multipath looks like "normal" module and geom_fox is very old one, before "rules" for modules was settled (metadata in first sector, no control utility, etc). Is it intentional? :) --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov