From owner-cvs-sys  Mon Nov  4 15:12:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-cvs-sys
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA10590
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 15:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA10473;
          Mon, 4 Nov 1996 15:11:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.7.6/8.6.5) with SMTP id PAA27201; Mon, 4 Nov 1996 15:10:29 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611042310.PAA27201@root.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org,
        CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs ufs_vnops.c 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 04 Nov 1996 11:32:39 PST."
             <3722.847135959@time.cdrom.com> 
From: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
Reply-To: dg@root.com
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 1996 15:10:29 -0800
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Er, ... should be in 2.* after testing for a month or three in -current.  
>
>Well, considering that 2.1.6 is going to bed in around 2 weeks, you
>don't *have* a month or three when you note something as being desired
>for 2.1.6. :-)
>
>Do you want me to back 'em out?  No probs if so.

   I think you should leave it in for now. It's a fairly serious bug and a
little risk is worth it in this case.

-DG

David Greenman
Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project