From owner-freebsd-chat Wed Jun 27 14:53:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D378037B401 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:53:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #6) id 15FNFG-000IRk-00; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:53:10 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) id f5RLrAH19721; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:53:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 22:53:09 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: David Scheidt Cc: Terry Lambert , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD and the shift to 'web services' Message-ID: <20010627225309.A18928@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> References: <20010627143033.A7900@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: ; from dscheidt@tumbolia.com on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 09:18:01AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, is that timing or what? Seems FreeBSD doesn't have to worry about writing its own .NET after all. However, i agree most of the issues remain, including updating (?) some of the development tools. But at least one of the biggest obstacles might be dealt with if MS really comes through on this one. Jonathon -- Microsoft complaining about the source license used by Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message