Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Jun 1999 12:00:02 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [Fwd: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf]
Message-ID:  <199906211900.MAA98103@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR misc/11796; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
To: Doug <Doug@gorean.org>
Cc: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>,
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>,
	freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, alex@wnm.net
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: misc/11796: Bad lines in 3.2-RELEASE inetd.conf]
Date: 21 Jun 1999 20:50:03 +0200

 Doug <Doug@gorean.org> writes:
 > 	You are really really missing my point here, so I will state it
 > again. If you have carefully examined the code for *every* case of *every*
 > internal service, and you have tested it thoroughly, and you are 100% sure
 > that the man page is in error, change the man page. 
 
 The confusion arises from the fact that inetd and /etc/services
 disagree on what the canonical name for the ident service is. Inetd
 has these canonical names hardcoded in an array of structs, so
 changing the canonical name in /etc/services does not affect inetd's
 belief of what the canonical name is.
 
 DES
 -- 
 Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906211900.MAA98103>