From owner-freebsd-arch Thu May 24 21:13:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9100537B422 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 21:13:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4P4DbE60065; Thu, 24 May 2001 22:13:37 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Message-Id: <200105250413.f4P4DbE60065@harmony.village.org> To: Brian Somers Subject: Re: RFC: unit_list routines Cc: Garrett Wollman , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 May 2001 18:48:22 BST." <200105231748.f4NHmMF08217@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> References: <200105231748.f4NHmMF08217@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 22:13:37 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200105231748.f4NHmMF08217@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> Brian Somers writes: : > I think the usual watchword is ``Don't optimize initialization.'' : : Maybe, but pessimising for no gains seems odd. Not optimizing is different than pessimizing. The usual phrase I hear around here is "premature submicro optimization." That is, optimizing before you know what's slow and in a way that won't matter in the end. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message