From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 26 00:38:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFB216A4CE; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:38:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1332643D2D; Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:38:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5732D645C; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:38:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63643-04; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:38:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936BF645D; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:38:10 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <412D30F1.9090500@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:38:09 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040809) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Kline References: <412D10E7.8020704@makeworld.com> <20040826000715.GD89034@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20040826000715.GD89034@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:52:25 +0000 cc: FreeBSD - Current cc: FreeBSD - Questions Subject: Re: 5.3-Beta1: So far, so goo. Day 5. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 00:38:15 -0000 Gary Kline wrote: > Hi Chris, and howdy rest-of-list, > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 05:21:27PM -0500, Chris wrote: > >>Well - this is my 5th day using 5.3-Beta1 (sup'ing from 5.2.1-p9) >>I removed the debuging code in the kernel - runs well for a Beta. > > > > Brave man... . > > I think I'll wait awhile before upgrading to RELENG_5. > But Q1: how exactly, does one get rid of the debugging stuff? > And Q2, now that we've got gcc-3.4, would it help to use a higher > opyimization? say, "-O3"? .... > > >>Since I use KDE, I did notice that Kgpg (whatever it is) is non >>functional. S'ok tho - I dont use Kmail so to me that's not an issue. >> >>Everything from an day-to-day basis runs. Nothing seems to have been >>broken that I found. >> >>This is my production PC at home, so it's being used constantly. >> >>I'm unsure where to post this, so I sent to Questions and Current. >> > > > I've got two 400MHz platforms, so I want to be able to max'z > the systems. System tuningg obviously helps, and hopefully > the new compiler will help too. > > cheers, > > gary > I can't answer Q2 - but I'll post my make.conf As to Q1 - in /usr/src/UPDATING it mentions the things in the kernel etc. that needs to be commented out. Very straight to the point. As to Q1, X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg CPUTYPE?=athlon CFLAGS= -O -pipe COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe PERL_VER=5.8.5 PERL_VERSION=5.8.5 PERL_ARCH=mach NOPERL=yo NO_PERL=yo NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo NO_PF=yo -- Best regards, Chris There is nothing more frightening than ignorance in action.