From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat May 14 09:36:23 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A730AB3A067
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 14 May 2016 09:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net)
Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA4F1A70
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 May 2016 09:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net)
Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix)
 id 8DF60B3A066; Sat, 14 May 2016 09:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9B9B3A065
 for <ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 May 2016 09:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net)
Received: from cerebro.liukuma.net (cerebro.liukuma.net
 [IPv6:2a00:d1e0:1000:1b00::2])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551051A6F
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 May 2016 09:36:23 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net)
Received: from cerebro.liukuma.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by cerebro.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31628B1F193
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 May 2016 12:36:15 +0300 (EEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at liukuma.net
Received: from cerebro.liukuma.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by cerebro.liukuma.net (cerebro.liukuma.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
 port 10027) with LMTP id v3Fb4cNoJrOm for <ports@freebsd.org>;
 Sat, 14 May 2016 12:36:14 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from Rivendell (dsl-kmibrasgw1-50dfdd-193.dhcp.inet.fi
 [80.223.221.193])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 (Authenticated sender: ignatz@cerebro.liukuma.net)
 by cerebro.liukuma.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38344B1F08C
 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 May 2016 12:36:14 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 cerebro.liukuma.net 38344B1F08C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=liukuma.net;
 s=liukudkim; t=1463218574;
 bh=aIUnBHyB1gD5+h8e2cJhwhQfYYQdHu6FlOaLlmu1apg=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date;
 b=pFYVvPx3USBJF7GSwdwntPcrYa+Ae2+ZmLPKdUDsQjBpEeNUWM2kB9fVnD8qbcYcY
 fHNXTIH+e7hlamGImuLWw4D5W56mc71Ap9Iwpm/y8CnscKURVc5uKBtJZL31TTFKth
 TSwTpsV+3jLKJu7Mt/mbLfM87bs7BylIybLyYTTM=
Message-ID: <3FB7B394F70C4284830025722F00896A@Rivendell>
From: "Reko Turja" <reko.turja@liukuma.net>
To: <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: Is there a way to automatically edit port Makefile and plist after
 updates
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 12:36:07 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="utf-8"; reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 16.4.3564.1216
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V16.4.3564.1216
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 09:36:23 -0000

There is one port that has completely unneeded things in both Makefile 
and plist. Is there a way to Automatically change those afterwards - I 
guess usual method of patching isn't applicable?

Of course doing a portsnap fetch update and sedding the unneeded stuff 
out from a shellscript each night instead of just portsnap is always 
an option if there's nothing more refined available.

-Reko