From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Feb 20 11:25:59 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA00564
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 20 Feb 1996 11:25:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA00553
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 20 Feb 1996 11:25:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.6.10/1.53)
    id UAA07476; Tue, 20 Feb 1996 20:25:44 +0100
From: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl (Guido van Rooij)
Message-Id: <199602201925.UAA07476@gvr.win.tue.nl>
Subject: pop3 and blocked users
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 20:25:43 +0100 (MET)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Shouldn't pop implementation check if users are having a shell not
listed in /etc/shells? Otherwise, blocked users will stil be able to
recieve mail..

-Guido