From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 19:17:24 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7D416A41F for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2DE13C43E for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 19:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmc20@xxiii.com) Received: from ibm61aec.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070602191722.JHXM16570.imf18aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm61aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:17:22 -0400 Received: from wcox.bellsouth.net ([68.209.177.221]) by ibm61aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20070602191722.BQA25479.ibm61aec.bellsouth.net@wcox.bellsouth.net> for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:17:22 -0400 Message-Id: <6.2.3.4.2.20070602151428.038fc1e0@mailsvr.xxiii.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.3.4 Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:17:36 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: r17fbsd@xxiii.com In-Reply-To: <466193DE.4090403@vindaloo.com> References: <759428.83918.qm@web57403.mail.re1.yahoo.com> <466193DE.4090403@vindaloo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: 10/100/1000 Ethernet hardware recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2007 19:17:24 -0000 At 11:59 AM 6/2/2007, Christopher Hilton wrote: >..... All of these machines are older Pentium III 1GHz single or >dual CPU class machines. ...... I'd like to go to Gig E to improve >performance for a hand full of clients on the local LAN and to move >critical data out of the DMZ. Eventually I plan to replace the >current generation of servers with something more modern like HP >DL360 G5 and DL380 G5 hardware. >Based on that, if my assumptions are correct then the 64bit Intel >Hardware seems to be the way to go. The disk bandwidth on your current servers is going to probably be the bottleneck. Highest I've been able to shoot over the wire is 33MB/s with similar hardware. Probably just by the inexpensive 32bit PCI cards now. You next gen' of machines will probably take PCI-E cards, not 64bit PCI-X. -RW