From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 19 06:38:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B0016A41F for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:38:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam.ru (gw.ipt.ru [80.253.10.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D4443D45 for ; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:38:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru) Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1EHFJ1-0002CA-JX; Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:39:11 +0400 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <200509172033.13722@aldan> <20050918112913.7eee1a41@Magellan.Leidinger.net> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:39:11 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20050918112913.7eee1a41@Magellan.Leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:29:13 +0200") Message-ID: <28017424@srv.sem.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: linux-pango's pango-querymodules X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 06:38:40 -0000 On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 11:29:13 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 20:33:13 -0400 > Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > For some reason, the post-install target of the linux-pango > > port fails for me every time, because the executable > > (/compat/linux/usr/bin/pango-querymodules) fails to find libX11.so.6 > > > > Adding an explicit invocation of Linux' ldconfig seems to help, though. > > Have you seen such a thing before? I'm using the 32-bit Linux emulation > > on FreeBSD-6.0/amd64. > Are you using a non-default linux_base? The default linux_base includes > the X11 directory in the ld.so.conf, so we don't need the ldconfig > part. Trevor failed to add it to his non-default linux_base versions > even after I told him about the problem (I did it at least once, maybe > more than once). > The reason why the linux_base port has to have this in ld.so.conf > instead of adding it when installing the linux-X11 bits is: the file is > owned by linux_base and no port should modify the files of other ports > if we can avoid it. Adding the directory in the linux_base port doesn't > hurt and causes a less complex de-/installation procedure for the > linux-X11 bits. BTW as for linux_base-rh-9 we do have a PR http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/85254 which solve the problem. The PR was opened at 23 Aug. Should we treat it as a maintainer timeout? WBR -- Boris B. Samorodov, Research Engineer InPharmTech Co, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet Service Provider